By: Gary Kah.
The anticipation and anxiety leading up to this fall’s historic election is intensifying by the day as Republicans and Democrats desperately jockey for position. Who will garner the most votes on November 3rd? Will we be led forward by Donald Trump and Mike Pence, or will it be Joe Biden and Kamala Harris?
Unlike most previous elections of our generation where there hasn’t been a huge difference between our presidential candidates, with contenders sometimes even belonging to the same exclusive clubs (i.e. George W. Bush and John Kerry were both members of Yale University’s Skull & Bones Society), the ticket this time is composed of candidates who are polar opposites in almost every respect. We are witnessing the clash of two completely opposing worldviews. One party has been overrun by Marxist globalists supporting a centralized economy and government and a flagrantly immoral, anti-Christian agenda. The other party is running on a pro-free enterprise, pro-Constitution, pro-America nationalist platform, which for the most part favorably aligns with Bible-believing Christians and conservative Jews. Never in our lifetime has there been such a stark contrast between the two major parties. It is not an overstatement to say that our existence as a free nation is at stake.
Freedom versus Socialism. No matter what obstacles you may face, GET OUT AND VOTE!
Unfortunately, greater unrest and violence will likely result regardless of who wins, as both sides recognize the long-term political consequences if the other party takes charge. Although physical shots have not yet been fired on a broad scale, for all practical purposes we are already at war. Brace yourselves because this could be just the beginning.
It is clear that Joe Biden has become a mere figurehead for the far-left Socialists who now commandeer the Democratic Party. Their real champion is Kamala Harris – a hardcore liberal Socialist who is entirely dedicated to the climate change/pro-UN/one-world agenda. If the Democrats win, Harris and her behind-the-scenes accomplices, not Biden, will be in charge. Things in the US would drastically change. There would be no turning back this time as the number of ultra Liberals in the US is growing, thanks to the combined efforts of leftist university professors, the social and conventional media, Hollywood, hi-tech moguls, and Millennial followers of BLM and AOC, the majority of whom are dedicated Socialists.
While the youthful Ocasio-Cortez is making her mark within the leftist Socialist movement, for now at least Kamala Harris is the favorite darling of the far-left elites. Two years ago, in our Fall 2018 issue I wrote the following as a “heads up” to our readers:
Keep your eyes on California Senator Kamala Harris. She is a rising star within the Democratic Party and is rapidly gaining popularity among Millennials. She is attractive, intelligent, well-spoken – and extremely liberal. Some political insiders believe she has her eyes on the White House…In order to become her party’s nominee, she would have to first overcome some of the older establishment Liberals such as Joe Biden.
Well, she’s almost there. If the Biden/Harris team wins, she will be only one heartbeat, or mini-stroke, away from being our Commander-in-Chief. For a while last year, she was closing in on the lead in the polls; but then during one of the prime time debates she made the mistake of revealing her true self by demonstrating her vicious side. As a result, she lost momentum. Nonetheless, the far-left elite found a way to get her on the ticket. They are betting that the country will vote for her if she is teamed up with a perceived moderate.
If Biden and Harris pull off this win, it is very likely that she will become president sometime during the first term. There is no way that Joe Biden can endure the pressures of the White House for four years given his mental and physical state. But even if he could, he would be a puppet. Harris would be running the show. More accurately, it would be her most powerful socialist backers who’d be calling the shots through her.
Increasing Tensions
During these final weeks before the election, the liberal powers that be will use every weapon in their arsenal to diminish the credibility and presidential stature of Donald Trump. As such, they will continue to do everything possible to ruin our economy via COVID restrictions, destructive riots and any other ploy at their disposal, hoping to effectively pin the blame for a crash – should it occur – on the President.
Democrats are becoming more desperate by the day as they are now facing the additional possibility of losing the Supreme Court. The death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg could not have come at a worse time for them. They would have kept her on life support until after the election, could they have done so. For liberal Democrats their worst nightmare is coming true.
The current heated battle over the Supreme Court has thrown fuel on the fire of an already tense political fight. No doubt, Democrats will use this latest controversy to launch further attacks on the Trump Administration and to rally their base. Meanwhile, Conservatives – including most Evangelicals – will use this same issue to rally their base. The question now becomes, which side will turn out the most voters. Are there more determined common sense Conservatives or radicalized Liberals in America today? We shall soon find out.
For those who wonder about the appropriateness of appointing a Justice to the Supreme Court in an election year, consider the following explanation recently posted by a member of our extended family:
Presidents, including previous President Obama, have followed the obligation of a sitting president to nominate a person to fill a vacancy in the Supreme Court in an election year. It is then to be left to the Senate to proceed with their duties [either to confirm or reject the nomination]. Precedent is important…
In early Spring 2016, then Vice President Biden agreed that the then sitting President Obama should go ahead and make a nomination in an election year after Justice Scalia died.
Filling a vacancy is important so that the Supreme Court can carry on its duties. In our nation’s history there have been the varying sides pushing their agendas claiming nominations should or should not be made in election years, in so doing politicizing what is to be the normal process according to the Constitution of the United States. The Supreme Court however is to be above politics. Therefore, President Trump should do his duty, as did President Obama, and nominate someone to fill the vacancy of recently passed Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and then the Senate should do its duty. There should be no threats made by opposing political views, persons, or parties. This is the way our government is to work in a stable, consistent orderly way based on our Constitution.
The current Supreme Court battle is highlighting the very deep divide existing within our nation. If Democrats lose this battle as well as the election itself, it will justify the burning of our cities – since in the minds of Socialists, “The end justifies the means.” An actual civil war could result, as shopkeepers and citizen militias begin to fight back against anarchists trying to destroy their property in unpatrolled streets. The lawless vacuum created by the “Defund the Police” movement is incredibly dangerous for our country and has set the stage for an explosive conflict.
On the other hand, what would happen if Democrats win the race for president? How would the Right respond once they realize our country’s watershed moment has arrived? Would they passively allow the Socialists to take the White House and our constitutional freedoms, or would they bear arms and fight to take our country and government back? The founding fathers, under God’s sovereign supervision, granted citizens the right to bear arms in order that tyranny could never rule in the United States. The Second Amendment to the US Constitution, ratified on December 15, 1791 (along with nine other articles of the Bill of Rights) was designed to protect the individual right to keep and bear arms. The main intent was for this act to serve as a deterrent against a hostile tyrannical regime usurping the freedoms of the American people.
Regardless of the outcome of this election, except for a miracle of God, we may be headed for war. Rarely in history has war been averted when a country has become this divided. This is all the more reason for Christians to be on their knees in prayer, petitioning our holy God for intervention in our nation’s affairs and for wisdom to know what we should do.
Foreign Enemies Watch and Wait
Should major unrest or civil war break out, the United States would be extremely vulnerable to an outside attack from our foreign adversaries. Seeing that we are distracted by an internal crisis, it would be very tempting for them to seize the opportunity for a surprise assault. If they were ever to attempt such a move, it would likely be under these circumstances.
While a nuclear attack on our coastal cities can never be ruled out, top defense experts would argue that the number one current threat to our national security is the targeted disruption of our power supply. It is the major concern of our most astute military leaders, who agree that our nation’s greatest weakness is the “electrical grid.” Author Kyle Mills describes our vast but soft energy network:
It’s been called the most complex machine in the world and that’s probably a fair description. Three thousand three hundred utility companies, fifty-five thousand individual substations, and two hundred thousand miles of transmission lines all coordinate to meet the country’s insatiable demand for power. Unfortunately, it’s this scope and complexity that makes us so vulnerable.1
Of the 55,000 substations, approximately 100 are absolutely critical to keeping our lights on. According to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, due to the interconnectedness of our grid, only nine of these critical substations would have to be disabled to plunge the entire country into darkness. Were this to happen, our power could be off for 18 months or longer. Such an outage would be devastating. James Woolsey Jr., the former director of the CIA, puts it in perspective:
If the power went out and stayed out for a year, between two-thirds and ninety percent of the American population would die. That’s more than both world wars and the bubonic plague combined.2
There are a number of ways that our electrical grid could be shut down. These include acts of organized terror as well as sabotage from within. In fact, a well planned attack was carried out on a substation near San Jose, California in 2013. It appears to have been a dry run for something bigger.3
Of equal or greater concern is the possibility of an EMP or cyber attack perpetrated by one of our foreign enemies. Currently China, Iran, Russia and N. Korea each have the ability to carry out such attacks against our grid. In the event of an EMP (Electromagnetic pulse), every single motor vehicle, machine or apparatus with a computer chip could also be incapacitated. A strong nuclear device detonated several miles above the Earth’s surface in the mid-section of the United States could theoretically disable the entire country.
A high-altitude EMP attack would be most effective if detonated around 25 miles above the Earth. The exploded nuclear device would produce “powerful gamma rays that radiate outward. Upon colliding with molecules in the Earth’s atmosphere, the downward-directed gamma rays create a powerful electromagnetic energy field.”4 The EMP probably wouldn’t hurt humans directly, but it would make electrical devices and attached cables act as antennas, hitting electronic systems with a surge of high-voltage current – essentially frying them.5 In other words, an EMP could send us back to the dark ages by potentially knocking out anything containing an electronic component.
Unlike an EMP, a comprehensive cyberattack, while potentially wiping out our electrical grid, would not directly destroy electronic devices or keep cars from running. However, the long-term effects could be just as damaging. For example, your car would work, but once it runs out of gas you couldn’t refuel at the pump because the pump is powered by electricity – which is no longer available. You get the picture.
Experts on these formidable covert technologies urged the Obama Administration to take the necessary steps to “harden” (protect) our power grid from the aforementioned attacks. However, their pleas fell on deaf ears and no actions were taken. Hence, valuable time has been lost. A while back, President Trump was presented with this same information. He has chosen to take these threats seriously and has responded accordingly. He made his precautionary measures official this past spring. On May 4, Peter Navarro, Director of the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy (OTMP) announced that President Trump had signed an Executive Order a few days earlier calling for the hardening of the US electrical grid in order to protect our power supply against attacks from foreign and domestic enemies.
These protective measures will undoubtedly include the rapid construction of deflective faraday shields over critical substations, with the first priority being to keep our military apparatus functional in the event of an attack. These measures would probably also involve significantly improving our cybersecurity and creating manual overrides in case our enemies find ways to circumvent these improvements. It is estimated that the defensive measures authorized by the President will take at least three to four years to fully implement (to secure our entire grid). This means we will be most vulnerable to power grid attacks during the next couple of years, as the huge task of hardening our system is just now getting underway. You can be certain that our enemies understand this timetable.
This serious vulnerability is one reason why our most loyal and dedicated military leaders are concerned about a leftist-spawned insurrection taking place in the near future, or for that matter, a fraudulent election that could produce a backlash uprising from the Right. In either case, the resulting domestic conflict could trigger a devastating attack from the outside.
We Need God
There is no question that we are living in very dangerous times. I genuinely believe that we have reached the point where we, as a nation, can only be spared by God’s divine intervention. If He chooses to lift His hand of protection, allowing the current manifestations of hatred and lawlessness to run their course, the final chapter of America’s history will soon be written.
Believers numbering in the tens of thousands gathered in Washington at the recent prayer events to intercede for our nation.
Prayer and repentance are the key to reaching the heart of God. He is a gracious and merciful God, full of compassion and love, and slow to anger. However, we Americans have tested His patience through our endless rebellion and immoral, wicked ways. Given our nation’s Judeo-Christian heritage, there is no excuse for America – including the church – to have wandered so far from the truth. Christians tolerated sin in their own lives, and thus in the lives of those around them, for far too long, giving the enemy a foothold in our communities. Over time, this rebellion has matured through our children and their children to encompass our major cities, states, and now our country. We failed to be courageous and bold when we could have taken a stand peacefully. Now, we may have to do so in the face of war…unless God intervenes.
Thankfully, thousands of America’s Christians are being awakened to the grim reality of our present situation, and have begun to earnestly cry out to God with repentant and contrite hearts. The prayer initiatives on September 26th led by Franklin Graham, Jonathan Cahn and others reflect the growing sense of urgency that is now taking hold among sincere Christ followers across our nation. We are still just a remnant, but the remnant is growing. We must hope and pray that the Lord will hear our petitions, and that any revival that occurs will be genuine and real – not like the few weeks of sobriety that followed 9/11 but then quickly faded.
The hour is late. No man – no candidate for president – can rescue the United States from the dire straits we are in. We are too far gone as a nation for any politician to bring us back. Only the Lord God can spare us, if He sees fit to intervene. So, let’s continue to appeal to God’s great grace and mercy as we pray for His swift and strong intervention. With His help – if He is willing – we will make it through the next few months in one piece as a nation. ■
Who knows? God may yet relent and with compassion turn from his fierce anger so that we will not perish. — Jonah 3:9
ENDNOTES:
1 Kyle Mills, FoxNews.com, https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/terror-bio-attack-nukes-threat-power-grid, September 17, 2020.
2 Ibid.
3 Ibid.
4 George Friedman, “The EMP Threat: How It Works and What It Means for the Korean Crisis,” February 26, 2018, a study originally produced for Mauldin Economics, accessed September 24, 2020 at www.geopoliticalfutures.com.
5 Ibid.
In Other Developments…
The COVID Manipulation
By now, many people have come to the realization that the COVID crisis has been overplayed and hyped by some of our medical professionals, the media elites, WHO officials and various other parties in order to force certain changes on our society – changes that “just happen” to align with the one-world agenda. What a strange coincidence!
Typically, I am not a fan of Sweden’s progressive political system. But on this occasion, Sweden bucked the international norm when it came to “fighting” COVID-19 and got it right. As a result, they have taken a beating from the international and US media for not playing their game. Recently, I came across an excellent piece by Mike Whitney of Global Research that summarizes Sweden’s approach and results – which the US and other countries should take to heart and learn from. Here are some insightful excerpts and statistics from his article titled “Sweden: The One Chart that Matters.”
While the COVID-19 epidemic continues to drag on in the United States, it’s largely over in Sweden where fatalities have dropped to no more than 2 deaths per day [as of mid summer]… Sweden has been harshly criticized in the media for not imposing draconian lockdowns like the United States and the other European countries…Sweden implemented a policy that was both conventional and sensible. They recommended that people maintain a safe distance between each other and they banned gatherings of 50 or more. They also asked their elderly citizens to isolate themselves and to avoid interacting with other people as much as possible. Other than that, Swedes were encouraged to work, exercise and get on with their lives as they would normally even though the world was still in the throes of a global pandemic…
The intention was never to “fight” the virus…but to protect the old and vulnerable while allowing the young, low-risk people to circulate, contract the virus, and develop the antibodies they’d need to fight similar pathogens in the future…That was the best approach. While Sweden could still experience sporadic outbreaks that might kill another 2 to 300 people, any recurrence of the infection in the Fall or Winter will not be a dreaded “Second Wave”, but a much weaker flu-like event that will not overwhelm the public health system or kill thousands of people…
The media has been particularly vicious in their criticism of Sweden’s approach…Check out this sampling of recent [US] headlines:
• Sweden becomes an example of how not to handle COVID-19, CBS NEWS
• Lack of Lockdown Increased COVID-19 Deaths in Sweden, U of V Newsroom
• Sweden Has Become the World’s Cautionary Tale, The New York Times
• Sweden Stayed Open And More People Died Of COVID-19, But The Real Reason May Be Something Darker, Forbes
• Sweden hoped herd immunity would curb COVID-19. Don’t do what we did. It’s not working. USA Today
• Sweden’s coronavirus death toll is now approaching zero, but experts are warning others not to hail it as a success, Business Insider
• Lack of COVID-19 Lockdown Increased Deaths in Sweden, Analysis Concludes, Virginia.edu
• Sweden COVID-19 Deaths Linked to Failure to Lockdown as Country Prepares for Second Wave, Newsweek
• Sweden Tries Out a New Status: Pariah State, The New York Times
…What has Sweden done that has provoked such a hostile response? Nothing, really…The Swedish approach stands in stark contrast to the lockdowns which are costly, ineffective and socially damaging. Here’s an excerpt from an article at The Evening Standard that underscores these very points:
“Lockdowns made little difference to the number of people who have died from coronavirus…Researchers from the University of Toronto and University of Texas found that whether a country was locked down or not was ‘not associated’ with the COVID-19 death rate.
Experts compared mortality rates and cases in 50 badly hit countries up until May 1 and calculated that only 33 out of every million people had died from the virus…The study found that imposing lockdown measures succeeded in stopping hospitals from being overwhelmed, but it did not translate into a significant reduction in deaths.
‘Government actions such as border closures, full lockdowns, and a high rate of COVID-19 testing were not associated with statistically significant reductions in the number of critical cases or overall mortality,’ the study, published in the Lancet online journal EClinicalMedicine, said.”
Bottom line: Lockdowns don’t work, but the media continues to support them. Why?
Because the media is owned by elites who see lockdowns as an effective way to exert greater control over the population. The real issue is power, not efficacy or saving lives. The Swedish model undermines this effort by providing a viable alternative that challenges lockdowns and leads countries out of crisis…Elites see crisis management as a useful tool for making the structural changes they want to impose on the political and economic systems. Billionaire oligarchs do not see crises as “periods of intense disorder of distress”, but golden opportunities that can be exploited to their advantage.
Sweden is also criticized for its fatality rate which is higher than some but lower than others…Sweden is somewhere in the middle of the pack…Sweden compares quite well to poorly-governed states in the US with similar-sized populations. Take a look:
• Sweden: No Lockdown
Population of 10.2 million
Coronavirus deaths – 5,667
• Lockdown State #1: New York, focus on New York City (Democrat Governor, Andrew Cuomo)
Population of 8.3 million
Coronavirus deaths – 32,133 (5 and a half times more than Sweden with 2 million less people.)
• Lockdown State #2: New Jersey (another Democrat Governor, Phil Murphy)
Population of 9.2 million (1 million less than Sweden)
Coronavirus deaths – 15,684 (nearly 3 times as many as Sweden with a smaller population.)
• Lockdown State #3: Massachusetts (another Democrat Governor, Charlie Baker)
Population of 6.9 million (3 million less than Sweden)
Coronavirus deaths – 8,380 (1 and a half times Sweden’s total with 3 million less people.)
These are the real Coronavirus losers, the three states that are run by liberal governors who imposed counterproductive lockdowns that collapsed their economies, killed tens of thousands of people, and did nothing to staunch the spread of the infection…
What does it all mean?
…Only 1 in every 7 people will contract the virus regardless of their exposure…A greater portion of the population have natural immunity than we thought…COVID-19 is not the Black Plague…It means that the idiot lockdowns did not prevent new cases and deaths but merely postponed them to a later date…Sweden was on the right track from the very beginning and is rapidly returning to normal while the US sinks deeper into a crisis of its own making.
(Source: Mike Whitney, “Sweden: The One Chart that Matters,” https://www.globalresearch.ca/sweden-one-chart-matters/5719458, July 26, 2020.)
COVID Vaccines and Bill Gates
The internationally-coordinated COVID response extends beyond the mere manipulation of the public narrative to the actual manipulation of the COVID vaccines currently being developed. At the forefront of funding the vaccines is none other than Bill Gates.
A benevolent philanthropist?
In 2010, when Gates committed $10 billion to the UN’s World Health Organization (WHO), he said, “We must make this the decade of vaccines.”1 While he has certainly made good on this promise, he actually launched his public pursuits in the area of vaccines back in 1999 when the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation donated $750 million to set up the Global Alliance of Vaccines and Immunizations (GAVI).2 More recently, Gates has also thrown his weight behind the ID2020 Alliance’s pursuit of a mandatory digital ID for every human. Among the most influential ID2020 Alliance partners are GAVI and Microsoft, who together with The Rockefeller Foundation, Accenture, the UN and the World Economic Forum hold the greatest sway over the progress of these efforts. (We covered this subject in detail in our Spring 2020 issue.) As investigative writer Scott Keisler puts it,
So basically Bill Gates has adopted as his personal mission the task of enrolling every single person on the planet in a global ID database. And vaccines are the vehicle through which this will be accomplished.3
Earlier this year Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman of Children’s Health Defense, penned a scathing article exposing Gates’ intentions, stating,
Vaccines, for Bill Gates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vaccination ID enterprise) and give him dictatorial control of global health policy.4
Kennedy continued,
In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI, and PATH, Gates funds a private pharmaceutical company that manufactures vaccines and is donating $50 million to 12 pharmaceutical companies to speed up development of a coronavirus vaccine.5
Is it possible that we are misinterpreting Gates’ intentions, and that he is really just a nice, wonderful Billionaire who wants to use his vast wealth to help save humankind? I try to give people the benefit of the doubt whenever I can. However, the Gates family has a long history of supporting eugenics. In fact, Bill Gates’ father was on the Board of Planned Parenthood,6 the abortion provider founded by Margaret Sanger on racist principles and eugenics.7 Bill himself has been supportive of the same organization and, over the years, has called for drastic reductions in the human population of the planet. Now we are supposed to believe that he has suddenly committed himself to saving billions of lives? This seems more like an oxymoron.
Consider the following disturbing results of Gates’ overseas vaccine endeavors which Kennedy carefully lays out in his article:
• In 2009, the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK) and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates-funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in [India’s] Supreme Court.
• In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a phase 3 trial of GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects, including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions, to 1,048 of the 5,949 children.
• During Gates’ 2002 MenAfriVac campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates’ operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. In the village of Gouro, located in northern Chad, approximately 50 of the 500 children vaccinated developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for the drug makers.” Nelson Mandela’s former senior economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philanthropic practices as “ruthless and immoral.”
• In 2010, when Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO, he said “We must make this the decade of vaccines.” A month later, Gates said in a TED Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population.” And, four years later, in 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a “tetanus” vaccine campaign. Independent labs found a sterility formula in every vaccine tested. After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade. Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines.
• A 2017 study (Morgenson et. al. 2017) showed that WHO’s popular DTP vaccine is killing more African children than the diseases it prevents. DTP-vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of children who had not yet received the vaccine. WHO refused to recall the lethal vaccine, which it forces upon tens of millions of African children annually.
• Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of steering WHO’s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases: clean water, hygiene, nutrition, and economic development. The Gates Foundation spends only about $650 million of its $5 billion dollar budget on these areas. They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal philosophy that good health only comes in a syringe.8
FYI – According to the Washington Times, Dr. Anthony Fauci “serves as a member of the Leadership Council for the Global Vaccine Action Plan developed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Health Organization, UNICEF and Fauci’s own NIAID – the plan that calls for a ‘Decade of Vaccines’ to spread far and wide, all around the globe.”9 Could it be that America has been far too trusting of Dr. Fauci and his cohorts? Have they led us down the path of COVID shutdowns for ulterior, preconceived globalist purposes? It appears more and more that this is the case.
There are currently upwards of fifteen COVID vaccines in various stages of development around the world. As mentioned, Gates is involved in helping to fund several of these pursuits. I am personally not opposed to the use of vaccines that are truly necessary. But, given the enormous manipulation surrounding this hyped pandemic, I would be extremely reluctant to accept any COVID vaccine, especially one funded in part or in whole by Bill Gates or those closely connected to him.
We do not yet know what ingredients will be in these concoctions. Until we know precisely what we are dealing with, no Christian – or non-Christian for that matter – should allow an unknown, potentially damaging substance to be placed in their body. To do so would be extremely unwise. If, as Christians, we truly believe that our bodies are the temple of the Holy Spirit, we have a duty before God to know what substances we allow into our bodies.
More information on COVID vaccines and their connection to the pursuit of a global digital ID mark will be forthcoming. Stay tuned! ■
ENDNOTES:
2 https://www.gavi.org/operating-model/gavis-partnership-model/bill-melinda-gates-foundation.
5 Ibid.
6 https://magazine.washington.edu/feature/the-immense-impact-of-bill-gates-sr/.
9 https://amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/11/bill-gates-anthony-fauci-unelected-destroyers-free/.